seems to be ok now.
maybe Peter Eisentraut can cross check again?
- Martin -
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 18:15, Martin Atukunda <matlads@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 23:55, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 00:53 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>>>> Why is there documentation for "PostgreSQL 9", here:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9/static/index.html
>>>>>
>>>>> 9.0 also exists, but this came up first in Google. Isn't this prone to
>>>>> create confusion about the version numbering?
>>>>
>>>> Yes I would think so.
>>>
>>>
>>> Indeed.
>>>
>>> Where did you find a link to "9"? It should really only show up as
>>> such if there's a link on our site to it somewhere, and I can't find
>>> it - and thus cna't remove it...b
>>
>> I just tried this using google.com
>>
>> http://www.google.com/search?q=link%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.postgresql.org%2Fdocs%2F9%2Fstatic%2Findex.html&hl=en
>>
>> sites that link to http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9/static/index.html
>>
>> gives the following:
>>
>> 1. http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/runtime-config-wal.html
>> 2. http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/app-pgresetxlog.html
>> 3. http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/release-8-2-6.html
>> 4. http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/functions-sequence.html
>>
>> The bread crumb links (Home → Documentation → Manuals → PostgreSQL 9)
>> seem to be the issue.
>
> Ah, cute. PHP automatically converts "9.0" to "9" when it's entered as
> a decimal. I guess that shouldn't be entirely surprising :-) I've
> changed it to a string now, and am rebuilding the website mirrors to
> get this right. Should be working in a couple of hours (yes, docs
> builds are slow)
>
> --
> Magnus Hagander
> Me: http://www.hagander.net/
> Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
>