Личный кабинет
Укажите e-mail, на который будет выслан код восстановления пароля.
На указанный вами адрес e-mail был выслан код подтверждения аккаунта. Введите полученный код для продолжения:
Введите новый пароль два раза:
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 23:55, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote: >> On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 00:53 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >>> Why is there documentation for "PostgreSQL 9", here: >>> >>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9/static/index.html >>> >>> 9.0 also exists, but this came up first in Google. Isn't this prone to >>> create confusion about the version numbering? >> >> Yes I would think so. > > > Indeed. > > Where did you find a link to "9"? It should really only show up as > such if there's a link on our site to it somewhere, and I can't find > it - and thus cna't remove it...b I just tried this using google.com http://www.google.com/search?q=link%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.postgresql.org%2Fdocs%2F9%2Fstatic%2Findex.html&hl=en sites that link to http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9/static/index.html gives the following: 1. http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/runtime-config-wal.html 2. http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/app-pgresetxlog.html 3. http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/release-8-2-6.html 4. http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/functions-sequence.html The bread crumb links (Home → Documentation → Manuals → PostgreSQL 9) seem to be the issue. - Martin -
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: