Re: stunnel with just postgresql client part

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От zhong ming wu
Тема Re: stunnel with just postgresql client part
Дата
Msg-id BANLkTimK=WrkZK-ytN_k29pAcFAzGimN8w@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: stunnel with just postgresql client part  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: stunnel with just postgresql client part  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I was not setting protocol.  But since I got your message, I tried
>> 'protocol = pgsql' in stunnel.conf
>
> see: http://pgbouncer.projects.postgresql.org/doc/faq.html#_how_to_use_ssl_connections_with_pgbouncer
>
> "Use Stunnel. Since version 4.27 it supports PostgreSQL protocol for
> both client and server side. It is activated by setting
> protocol=pgsql.
>
> For older 4.2x versions the support code is available as patch:
> stunnel-postgres.diff
>
> Alternative is to use Stunnel on both sides of connection, then the
> protocol support is not needed."
>


Thanks.  Yes, when I installed the latest stunnel-4.36 it works.

One strange thing I notice.  When I do ssl connect with psql I am
supposed to get a message like

SSL connection (cipher: DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA, bits: 256)

With client side stunnel and (nonssl capable) psql I am not getting
this message.  But still the connection seems to be ssl..

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tomas Vondra
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: FILLFACTOR and increasing index
Следующее
От: Merlin Moncure
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: stunnel with just postgresql client part