On Aug 20, 2008, at 1:18 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> If you're worried about storage space, I wouldn't go for arrays of
> composite :-(. The tuple header overhead is horrendous, almost
> certainly a lot worse than hstore.
Oh holy cow, I didn't realize we had a big header in there. Is that
to allow for changing the definition of the composite type?
--
Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect decibel@decibel.org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828