On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> My solution is to create a new process called the DeArchiver. This
> will run restore_command in a tight loop until the number of files
> would exceed wal_keep_files, then sleep. Each time the DeArchiver
> executes restore_command it will set the return code and if rc=0 the
> new XLogRecPtr reached. If standby_mode = on it will continue to retry
> indefinitely.
Are you thinking of reusing the existing GUC wal_keep_segments (not
wal_keep_files), or creating a new one? I'd suggest creating a new
one, so as to avoid having a GUC that does one thing on the master and
something quite different on the slave.
> Which do we prefer "DeArchiver", "Restore process", or "WALFileReceiver".
My personal preference would be restore process, since we already use
the name restore_command.
> Thoughts?
+1. Great idea.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company