Re: [HACKERS] pg_resetwal is broken if run from v10 against olderversion of PG data directory

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: [HACKERS] pg_resetwal is broken if run from v10 against olderversion of PG data directory
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoYBgbfuejPqyz7y8MBnJeccvL56BOua7yxX9rN=efLyuQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] pg_resetwal is broken if run from v10 against olderversion of PG data directory  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 4:24 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Just check the name of the directory so that pg_resetwal will refuse
> to run against pg_xlog directory

That's a strictly weaker integrity check than what Tom already
committed.  That only distinguishes pre-10 from post-10, whereas Tom
linked it to the specific major version, which is better.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Effect of changing the value for PARALLEL_TUPLE_QUEUE_SIZE
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: [HACKERS] Re: transition table behavior with inheritance appears broken (was:Declarative partitioning - another take)