On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 3:16 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 2016-03-30 07:13:16 +0530, Dilip Kumar wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 10:43 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>>
>> > My gut feeling is that we should do both 1) and 2).
>> >
>> > Dilip, could you test performance of reducing ppc's spinlock to 1 byte?
>> > Cross-compiling suggest that doing so "just works". I.e. replace the
>> > #if defined(__ppc__) typedef from an int to a char.
>> >
>>
>> I set that, but after that it hangs, even Initdb hangs..
>
> Yea, as Tom pointed out that's not going to work. I'll try to write a
> patch for approach 1).
Does this mean that any platform that wants to perform well will now
need a sub-4-byte spinlock implementation? That's has a somewhat
uncomfortable sound to it.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company