Re: Why don't we have a small reserved OID range for patch revisions?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Why don't we have a small reserved OID range for patch revisions?
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoYYrBDqNL528+ZrXvs0ro+ucAoGg1hX_sCpD__+fkxyAg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Why don't we have a small reserved OID range for patch revisions?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 11:59 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> To the extent that this works at all, OIDs in the 9000 range ought
> to be enough of a flag already, I think.

A "flag" that isn't documented anywhere outside of a mailing list
discussion and that isn't checked by any code anywhere is not much of
a flag, IMHO.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: dsa_allocate() faliure