On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 4:47 AM Markus Wanner
<markus.wanner@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> I agree with Michael, it would be nice to not duplicate the code, but
> use a common underlying method. A modified patch is attached.
I don't think this is better, but I don't think it's worth arguing
about, either, so I'll do it this way if nobody objects.
Meanwhile, I've committed the patch for master to master.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com