Re: Pglogical questions and problems

On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 4:38 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Anyway, who agrees with the overall design of pglogical and who does not?

I haven't spent very much time on it yet.  I tend to prefer the idea
of integrating it more deeply into core and adding SQL syntax around
it, but I'm not going to fight tooth and nail for that if a contrary
consensus emerges.

I think this would be a good topic to discuss at PGCon.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company