Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11
Дата
Msg-id CA+Tgmobq87FsRqzimbsq0WuPwZejJoO8oYyk3BJecpoOhR254Q@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 7:15 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 04:34:48PM +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> In terms of timing of commits, I have marked the patch Ready For
>> Committer. To me that signifies that it is ready for review by a
>> Committer prior to commit.
>
> My understanding of this meaning is different than yours.  It should not
> be the author's role to mark his own patch as ready for committer, but
> the role of one or more people who have reviewed in-depth the proposed
> patch and feature concepts.  If you can get a committer-level individual
> to review your patch, then good for you.  But review basics need to
> happen first.  And based on my rough lookup of this thread this has not
> happened yet.  Other people on this thread are pointing out that as
> well.

+1 to all of that.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11
Следующее
От: Oliver Ford
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Add RANGE with values and exclusions clauses to the Window Functions