Re: [HACKERS] Should buffer of initialization fork have aBM_PERMANENT flag

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Should buffer of initialization fork have aBM_PERMANENT flag
Дата
Msg-id CA+Tgmobr9tfAsu2wS6L88suu0g875349PyNKtR2L0pMAfDrExg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Should buffer of initialization fork have aBM_PERMANENT flag  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Should buffer of initialization fork have aBM_PERMANENT flag  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 8:51 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I agree with that, but I propose the attached version instead.  It
>> seems cleaner to have the entire test for setting BM_PERMANENT in one
>> place rather than splitting it up as you did.
>
> Fine for me. You may want to update the comment of BM_PERMANENT in
> buf_internals.h as Artur has mentioned upthread. For example by just
> adding "and init forks".

OK, done, and back-patched all the way.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Petr Jelinek
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication existing data copy
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add test case for two phasecommit. Also by Masahiko Sawada.