On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Dimitri Fontaine
<dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr> wrote:
> Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> writes:
>> If we introduce "walrestore" process, pg_standby seems no longer useful.
>
> pg_standby is one possible restore_command, right? I had understood
> that walrestore would be the process that cares for running that
> command, not another implementation of it.
Yes, that was the idea.
> That said, I would really like us to provide a default restore command,
> so if you had any intend of handling the restoring command in the
> walrestore process, by all means, go ahead :)
A different proposal, I think. Not no, just not here and now.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services