Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt
Дата
Msg-id CA+U5nMK13ij662FZKkc6ZcwA1EVd_Dj1DozhTS-jQc1dftKCow@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на foreign key locks, 2nd attempt  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Ответы Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 6:12 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:

> So Noah Misch proposed using the FOR KEY SHARE syntax, and that's what I
> have implemented here.  (There was some discussion that instead of
> inventing new SQL syntax we could pass the necessary lock mode
> internally in the ri_triggers code.  That can still be done of course,
> though I haven't done so in the current version of the patch.)

FKs are a good short hand, but they aren't the only constraint people
implement. It can often be necessary to write triggers to enforce
complex constraints. So user triggers need access to the same
facilities that ri triggers uses. Please keep the syntax.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Simon Riggs
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt
Следующее
От: Greg Smith
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Core Extensions relocation