Re: why do we need two snapshots per query?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: why do we need two snapshots per query?
Дата
Msg-id CA+U5nMKBCnjB4HY5npvW_XFfNFLTAZjoKDoVOMRL0viU6YfqOA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: why do we need two snapshots per query?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: why do we need two snapshots per query?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
>> Tom, in that earlier thread you said you'd be doing something in this
>> release about that. Can you say more about what that was, and will you
>> be doing it still?
>
> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git&a=commitdiff&h=e6faf910d75027bdce7cd0f2033db4e912592bcc
>
> I think that largely supersedes what I understood your notion of a
> one-shot plan to be about, though perhaps I missed something?

I was looking at other use cases, specifically partitioning/partial indexes.

If we could be certain that a query was being executed immediately
then it would be possible to simplify expressions using stable
functions as if they were constants. My earlier patch did exactly
that.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_restore --no-post-data and --post-data-only
Следующее
От: Simon Riggs
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Avoiding shutdown checkpoint at failover