Re: [HACKERS] Moving relation extension locks out of heavyweight lock manager

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Masahiko Sawada
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Moving relation extension locks out of heavyweight lock manager
Дата
Msg-id CA+fd4k6p9PfP08owkJ529euydVx22WVMh8gYNr6qvB-e5_GQLw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Moving relation extension locks out of heavyweight lock manager  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 13:16, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 12:47 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Type of table: normal table, unlogged table
> > Number of child tables : 16, 64 (all tables are located on the same tablespace)
> > Number of clients : 32
> > Number of trials : 100
> > Duration: 180 seconds for each trials
> >
> > The hardware spec of server is Intel Xeon 2.4GHz (HT 160cores), 256GB
> > RAM, NVMe SSD 1.5TB.
> > Each clients load 10kB random data across all partitioned tables.
> >
> > Here is the result.
> >
> >  childs |   type   | target  |  avg_tps   | diff with HEAD
> > --------+----------+---------+------------+------------------
> >      16 | normal   | HEAD    |   1643.833 |
> >      16 | normal   | Patched |  1619.5404 |      0.985222
> >      16 | unlogged | HEAD    |  9069.3543 |
> >      16 | unlogged | Patched |  9368.0263 |      1.032932
> >      64 | normal   | HEAD    |   1598.698 |
> >      64 | normal   | Patched |  1587.5906 |      0.993052
> >      64 | unlogged | HEAD    |  9629.7315 |
> >      64 | unlogged | Patched | 10208.2196 |      1.060073
> > (8 rows)
> >
> > For normal tables, loading tps decreased 1% ~ 2% with this patch
> > whereas it increased 3% ~ 6% for unlogged tables. There were
> > collisions at 0 ~ 5 relation extension lock slots between 2 relations
> > in the 64 child tables case but it didn't seem to affect the tps.
> >
>
> How did you measure the collisions in this test?  I think it is better
> if Mahendra can also use the same technique in measuring that count.
>

I created a created a SQL function that returns the hash value of the
lock tag, which is tag_hash(locktag, sizeof(RelExtLockTag)) %
N_RELEXTLOCK_ENTS. And examined the hash values of all tables.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada            http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: keisuke kuroda
Дата:
Сообщение: In PG12, query with float calculations is slower than PG11
Следующее
От: Fujii Masao
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: A bug in LWLOCK_STATS