Re: Move syncscan.c?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas Munro
Тема Re: Move syncscan.c?
Дата
Msg-id CA+hUKG+0hsrrQECQOhtM1Cr_kiaA4SfV3=+aLzwTCG0d5j8b2A@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Move syncscan.c?  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 6:28 AM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 2020-06-23 13:30:39 +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > I suppose it's remotely possible that someone might invent
> > physical-order index scans, and once you have those you might sync
> > scans of those too, and then even table would be too specific, but
> > that may be a bit far fetched.
>
> Hm. That'd be an argument for moving it to access/common. I don't really
> see a reason not to go for that?

Ok, done that way.  Thanks.

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Ashutosh Sharma
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: recovering from "found xmin ... from before relfrozenxid ..."
Следующее
От: Dilip Kumar
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions