Re: Reducing power consumption on idle servers

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas Munro
Тема Re: Reducing power consumption on idle servers
Дата
Msg-id CA+hUKGKc5yh=53FhMoQ0MXVOR3FoALFi7y5n5OSyaDposD_MLg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Reducing power consumption on idle servers  (Simon Riggs <simon.riggs@enterprisedb.com>)
Ответы Re: Reducing power consumption on idle servers
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 7:54 AM Simon Riggs
<simon.riggs@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> I agree. I can't see a reason to keep it anymore.

+    Use of <varname>promote_trigger_file</varname> is deprecated. If you're

I think 'deprecated' usually implies that it still works but you
should avoid it.  I think you need something stronger.

> I'm nervous about not having any wakeup at all, but since we are
> removing the parameter there is no other reason not to do as Andres
> suggests.

Why?  If we're accidentally relying on this timeout for recovery to
not hang in some situation, that's a bug waiting to be discovered and
fixed and it won't be this patch's fault.

> New version attached, which assumes that the SIGALRMs are silenced on
> the other thread.

I tested this + Bharath's v5 from the other thread.  meson test
passes, and tracing the recovery process shows that it is indeed,
finally, completely idle.  Huzzah!



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: New docs chapter on Transaction Management and related changes
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: test/modules/test_oat_hooks vs. debug_discard_caches=1