Re: PostmasterIsAlive() in recovery (non-USE_POST_MASTER_DEATH_SIGNAL builds)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas Munro
Тема Re: PostmasterIsAlive() in recovery (non-USE_POST_MASTER_DEATH_SIGNAL builds)
Дата
Msg-id CA+hUKGLQb+eWUHRb+_=aQZwSVZTk4FdyxWuv4pm5XiRk7y8j=g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: PostmasterIsAlive() in recovery (non-USE_POST_MASTER_DEATH_SIGNAL builds)  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>)
Ответы Re: PostmasterIsAlive() in recovery (non-USE_POST_MASTER_DEATH_SIGNAL builds)  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 2:44 PM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
> I found 0001 patch was committed in de829ddf23, and which added new
> wait event WalrcvExit. This name seems not consistent with other wait
> events. I'm thinking it's better to rename it to WalReceiverExit. Thought?
> Patch attached.

Agreed, your names are better.  Thanks.

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Fujii Masao
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PostmasterIsAlive() in recovery (non-USE_POST_MASTER_DEATH_SIGNAL builds)
Следующее
От: "tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com"
Дата:
Сообщение: RE: [POC] Fast COPY FROM command for the table with foreign partitions