Re: Sub-millisecond [autovacuum_]vacuum_cost_delay broken

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas Munro
Тема Re: Sub-millisecond [autovacuum_]vacuum_cost_delay broken
Дата
Msg-id CA+hUKGLi=2P3hEDwwjZfDZk2cyKxf1fgk0Pb=14AArK677Keog@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Sub-millisecond [autovacuum_]vacuum_cost_delay broken  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Sub-millisecond [autovacuum_]vacuum_cost_delay broken  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Erm, but maybe I'm just looking at this too myopically.  Is there
really any point in letting people set it to 0.5, if it behaves as if
you'd set it to 1 and doubled the cost limit?  Isn't it just more
confusing?  I haven't read the discussion from when fractional delays
came in, where I imagine that must have come up...



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Thomas Munro
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Sub-millisecond [autovacuum_]vacuum_cost_delay broken
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Date-Time dangling unit fix