On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 5:17 AM, Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy@gmail.com> wrote:
> If the argument for moving pg_reorg into core is "faster and easier"
> development, well I don't really buy that.
I don't see any problem in having pg_reorg in PGXN instead.
I've tried adding a META.json to the project and it seems working fine
with the pgxn client. It is together with other patches in my own
github fork.
https://github.com/dvarrazzo/pg_reorg/
I haven't submitted it to PGXN as I prefer the original author to keep
the ownership.
-- Daniele