Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp().

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dmitry Dolgov
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp().
Дата
Msg-id CA+q6zcXjG34kQy_hskZQjhajFCR8XhfHsHXL2orB4te2Vwdmbg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp().  (Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp().  (Arthur Zakirov <a.zakirov@postgrespro.ru>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения
> On 18 February 2018 at 18:49, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 17 February 2018 at 10:02, Arthur Zakirov <a.zakirov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 05:23:53PM +0100, Dmitry Dolgov wrote:
> > >
> > > SELECT to_timestamp('2000 + JUN', ' /') FROM dual
> > > ORA-01830: date format picture ends before converting entire input string
> > >
> > > SELECT to_timestamp('2000 + JUN', ' ') FROM dual
> > > ORA-01830: date format picture ends before converting entire input string
> > >
> > > It's sort of corner case, but anyway maybe you would be interested to handle
> > > it.
> >
> > I think it could be fixed by another patch. But I'm not sure that it
> > will be accepted as well as this patch :).
>
> Why do you think there should be another patch for it?

Just to make myself clear. I think it's fair enough to mark this patch as ready
for committer - the implementation is neat and sufficient as for me, and it
provides a visible improvement for user experience. The question above is
probably the only thing that prevents me from proposing this.

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tomas Vondra
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Hash Joins vs. Bloom Filters / take 2
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Better Upgrades