On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 9:44 AM Fabrízio de Royes Mello
<fabriziomello@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 12:54 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > The user choosing to convert a physical standby to a subscriber would
> > in some cases be interested in converting it for all the databases
> > (say for the case of upgrade [1]) and giving options for each database
> > would be cumbersome for her.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > [1] - This tool can be used in an upgrade where the user first
> > converts physical standby to subscriber to get incremental changes and
> > then performs an online upgrade.
> >
>
> The first use case me and Euler discussed some time ago to upstream this tool was exactly what Amit described so IMHO
weshould make it easier for users to subscribe to all existing user databases.
>
I feel that will be a good use case for this tool especially now
(with this release) when we allow upgrade of subscriptions. In this
regard, I feel if the user doesn't specify any database it should have
subscriptions for all databases and the user should have a way to
provide publication/slot/subscription names.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.