Re: [HACKERS] Write Ahead Logging for Hash Indexes

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Kapila
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Write Ahead Logging for Hash Indexes
Дата
Msg-id CAA4eK1K0UJswCRf81WwJFO4H=+ZvbmKTNhAps-NkdmHRsq1GnQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Write Ahead Logging for Hash Indexes  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Write Ahead Logging for Hash Indexes  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 10:59 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 11:48 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>> We didn't found any issue with the above testing.
>
> Great!  I've committed the latest version of the patch, with some
> cosmetic changes.
>

Thanks a lot.  I have noticed that the test case patch for "snapshot
too old" is not committed.  Do you want to leave that due to timing
requirement or do you want me to submit it separately so that we can
deal with it separately and may take an input from Kevin?

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Noah Misch
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Suppress Clang 3.9 warnings
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] New procedural language