On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 10:41 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Oh! Good catch. Given that the behavior in question is intentional
>> there and intended to provide backward compatibility, changing it in
>> back-branches doesn't seem like a good plan. I'll adjust the patch so
>> that it continues to ignore errors in that case.
>
> Updated patch attached.
>
Patch looks good to me.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com