Re: parallel vacuum - few questions on docs, comments and code

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Kapila
Тема Re: parallel vacuum - few questions on docs, comments and code
Дата
Msg-id CAA4eK1KG32TZu78TyYymazU9sk-tEkQLe8gkuidFsRho6CgzaA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: parallel vacuum - few questions on docs, comments and code  (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: parallel vacuum - few questions on docs, comments and code  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 1:30 PM Bharath Rupireddy
<bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 11:10 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > If the patch changes the vacuumdb code as above then isn't it better
> > to change the vacuumdb docs to reflect the same. See below part of
> > vacuumdb docs:
> > -P parallel_degree
> > --parallel=parallel_degree
>
> Changed.
>
> > Also, can you please check if your patch works for PG-13 as well
> > because I think it is better to backpatch it?
>
> I'm not sure about backpatching as it is not a critical bug fix. Since
> the changes are user visible, I think that it's okay to backpatch.
>

Yes, as it is a user-visible change (though minor) so I thought it
would be good to backpatch this. Does anyone else have any opinion on
this?

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Thomas Munro
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: seawasp failing, maybe in glibc allocator
Следующее
От: Bharath Rupireddy
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Logical Replication - behavior of TRUNCATE ... CASCADE