On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 8:35 AM 邱宇航 <iamqyh@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> And one more question, what LogAccessExclusiveLocks in LogStandbySnapshot is used for?
>
As far as I understand, this is required to ensure that we have
acquired all the AccessExclusiveLocks on relations before we can say
standby has reached STANDBY_SNAPSHOT_READY and allow read-only queries
in standby. Read comments above LogStandbySnapshot.
> Can We remove this.
>
I don't think so. In general, if you want to change and or remove
some code, it is your responsibility to come up with a reason/theory
why it is OK to do so.
> 2020年5月6日 上午10:36，邱宇航 <iamqyh@gmail.com> 写道：
>
> I mean that all resources protected by XLOG_STANDBY_LOCK should redo later.
> The semantics of XLOG_STANDBY_LOCK is still kept.
>
I don't think we can postpone it. If we delay applying
XLOG_STANDBY_LOCK and apply others then the result could be
unpredictable as explained in my previous email.
Note - Please don't top-post. Use the style that I and or others are
using in this list as that will make it easier to understand and
respond to your emails.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com