On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 5:03 AM Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote:
>
Now that the main patch is committed, I have reviewed the other two patches.
v37-0002-Drop-reltuples
1.
@@ -2289,11 +2289,10 @@ vacuum_one_index(Relation indrel,
IndexBulkDeleteResult **stats,
/* Do vacuum or cleanup of the index */
if (lvshared->for_cleanup)
- lazy_cleanup_index(indrel, stats, lvshared->reltuples,
- lvshared->estimated_count, vacrelstats);
+ lazy_cleanup_index(indrel, stats, vacrelstats);
else
lazy_vacuum_index(indrel, stats, dead_tuples,
- lvshared->reltuples, vacrelstats);
+ vacrelstats);
I don't think the above change is correct. How will vacrelstats have
correct values when vacuum_one_index is called via parallel workers
(via parallel_vacuum_main)?
The v37-0003-Avoid-some-calls-to-RelationGetRelationName.patch looks
good to me. I have added the commit message in the patch.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com