On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 at 15:16, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 02:04:22PM +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> > It makes sense to talk about the hashing variations closer to the
> > object identifier part.
>
> Mostly what I had in mind. A separate <para> for the new part you are
> adding at the end of the first part feels a bit more natural split
> here. Feel free to discard my comment if you think that's not worth
> it.
Thanks for the review. I've now pushed this, backpatching to 12.
David