Re: Why is DEFAULT_FDW_TUPLE_COST so insanely low?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David Rowley
Тема Re: Why is DEFAULT_FDW_TUPLE_COST so insanely low?
Дата
Msg-id CAApHDvpTdor8FufTQoEh0ByCFX+Dm9==BmU7M_xQG0_vADnKTA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Why is DEFAULT_FDW_TUPLE_COST so insanely low?  (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Why is DEFAULT_FDW_TUPLE_COST so insanely low?  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Re: Why is DEFAULT_FDW_TUPLE_COST so insanely low?  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 at 11:16, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'd be happy if anyone else would like to try the same experiment to
> see if there's some other value of DEFAULT_FDW_TUPLE_COST that might
> suit better.

No takers on the additional testing so I've pushed the patch that
increases it to 0.2.

David

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)"
Дата:
Сообщение: RE: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby
Следующее
От: Peter Smith
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: add log messages when replication slots become active and inactive (was Re: Is it worth adding ReplicationSlot active_pid to ReplicationSlotPersistentData?)