Re: Avoid unecessary MemSet call (src/backend/utils/cache/relcache.c)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David Rowley
Тема Re: Avoid unecessary MemSet call (src/backend/utils/cache/relcache.c)
Дата
Msg-id CAApHDvqmtQH8GE3p1kUVo2oY_ei6sDhrtiU=f4S2HLSv1f91SA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Avoid unecessary MemSet call (src/backend/utils/cache/relcache.c)  (Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Avoid unecessary MemSet call (src/backend/utils/cache/relcache.c)  (Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sun, 15 May 2022 at 09:47, Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com> wrote:
> At function load_relcache_init_file, there is an unnecessary function call,
> to initialize pgstat_info pointer to NULL.
>
> MemSet(&rel->pgstat_info, 0, sizeof(rel->pgstat_info));

What seems to have happened here is the field was changed to become a
pointer in 77947c51c.  It's not incorrect to use MemSet() to zero out
the pointer field.  What it does probably do is confuse the casual
reader into thinking the field is a struct rather than a pointer to
one.   It's probably worth making that consistent with the other
fields so nobody gets confused.

Can you add a CF entry for PG16 for this so we come back to it after we branch?

David



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Thomas Munro
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Condition pushdown: why (=) is pushed down into join, but BETWEEN or >= is not?
Следующее
От: Thomas Munro
Дата:
Сообщение: has_wal_read_bug