Re: Why is parula failing?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David Rowley
Тема Re: Why is parula failing?
Дата
Msg-id CAApHDvrEEkNnq_Xf5w-KFBhhNnUs3oYhr8EUtQxPy-2JU3hw-A@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Why is parula failing?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Why is parula failing?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Why is parula failing?  (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 at 12:36, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> So yeah, if we could have log_autovacuum_min_duration = 0 perhaps
> that would yield a clue.

FWIW, I agree with your earlier statement about it looking very much
like auto-vacuum has run on that table, but equally, if something like
the pg_index record was damaged we could get the same plan change.

We could also do something like the attached just in case we're
barking up the wrong tree.

David

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: David Rowley
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Flushing large data immediately in pqcomm
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Why is parula failing?