Re: Signals in a BGW

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: Signals in a BGW
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqQv6_9s97skJ_cn6m9mSNZu19azQgEc0iB0xCS1X13-QA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Signals in a BGW  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> pglogical sets up its own handler 'handle_sigterm'. However, it now does
> much the same as src/backend/tcop/postgres.c's 'die' function, just without
> the single-user mode checks.

Documentation shows a simple example of that:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/source-conventions.html

> IMO it's silly to customise them, and a bad example.

I don't agree. It is not silly to have background workers being able
to take clean up actions and have their own tracking with some
sig_atomic_t flags.
-- 
Michael


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Craig Ringer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Signals in a BGW
Следующее
От: Thomas Munro
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: es_query_dsa is broken