Re: Regarding BGworkers

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: Regarding BGworkers
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqR=SPzPj5s0AhA-8Mt+WA4C4yv7B4i5mn0ZVk9Ev=BkVA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Regarding BGworkers  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: Regarding BGworkers
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> That seems more mess than just keeping that function in postmaster.c.
> I agree with moving the other one.
Please find attached a patch for that can be applied on master branch.
do_start_bgworker is renamed to StartBackgroundWorker and moved to
bgworker.c. At the same time, bgworker_quickdie, bgworker_die and
bgworker_sigusr1_handler are moved to bgworker.c as they are used in
do_start_bgworker.

Regards,
--
Michael
Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: File-per-GUC WAS: Re: ALTER SYSTEM SET command to change postgresql.conf parameters (RE: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review])
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Should we remove "not fast" promotion at all?