Re: Remove fsync ON/OFF as a visible option?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: Remove fsync ON/OFF as a visible option?
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqRLWm+dD_uX1MC88FgEEW=b_T8X_95e=Kes9bg2zQ2EQw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Remove fsync ON/OFF as a visible option?  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
Ответы Re: Remove fsync ON/OFF as a visible option?  (Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 2:47 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>> There are just as many people that are running with scissors that are now
>> running (or attempting to run) our elephant in production. Does it make
>> sense to remove fsync (and possibly full_page_writes) from such a visible
>> place as postgresql.conf?
>
> -1
>
> Anyone turning off fsync without even for a moment considering the
> consequences has only themselves to blame. I can't imagine why you'd
> want to remove full_page_writes or make it less visible either, since
> in principle it ought to be perfectly fine to turn it off in
> production once its verified as safe.

-1 for its removal as well. It is still useful for developers to
emulate CPU-bounded loads...
-- 
Michael



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Abbreviated keys for Numeric
Следующее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: proposal: searching in array function - array_position