Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidaeis *still* broken)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidaeis *still* broken)
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqRXyU97tKYna7Y11U9dTrtTUheX3-XQeavxDtcQK9wU+w@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidaeis *still* broken)  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidaeis *still* broken)  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 8:20 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think the real question here is, shall we backpatch this fix or we
> want to do this just in Head or we want to consider it as a new
> feature for PostgreSQL-11.  I think it should be fixed in Head and the
> change seems harmless to me, so we should even backpatch it.

The thing is not invasive, so backpatching is a low-risk move. We can
as well get that into HEAD first, wait a bit for dust to settle on it,
and then backpatch.
-- 
Michael



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidaeis *still* broken)
Следующее
От: Daniel Gustafsson
Дата:
Сообщение: [HACKERS] Bug when dumping "empty" operator classes