Re: Exposing PG_VERSION_NUM in pg_config

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: Exposing PG_VERSION_NUM in pg_config
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqS0pq2OZAE=3vvOkC3snQAny5k9Umvt9XOR=61wqr=haA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Exposing PG_VERSION_NUM in pg_config  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Ответы Re: Exposing PG_VERSION_NUM in pg_config  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Re: Exposing PG_VERSION_NUM in pg_config  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
<div dir="ltr"><br /><div class="gmail_extra"><br /><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 5:39 AM, Peter
Eisentraut<span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:peter_e@gmx.net" target="_blank">peter_e@gmx.net</a>></span> wrote:<br
/><blockquoteclass="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span
class="">On3/25/15 1:32 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:<br /> > Well, I have no other cases than ones of the type
mentionedupthread,<br /> > and honestly I am fine as long as we do not apply maths to a version<br /> > string.
Soattached is a patch that adds VERSION_NUM in<br /> > Makefile.global.<br /><br /></span>How would you make use of
thisin an extension makefile?<br /></blockquote></div><br /></div><div class="gmail_extra">One use case is regression
testlist filtering depending on backend version.<br />-- <br /><div class="gmail_signature">Michael<br
/></div></div></div>

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jim Nasby
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Vacuuming big btree indexes without pages with deleted items
Следующее
От: Jim Nasby
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Bug fix for missing years in make_date()