Re: gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting for checkpoint

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Magnus Hagander
Тема Re: gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting for checkpoint
Дата
Msg-id CABUevEwHSy=oaimevRryg=sFC-0CSkyksFFt85BCM-uCAgfDsA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting for checkpoint  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting for checkpoint  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Michael Banck <michael.banck@credativ.de> wrote:
Hi,

Am Montag, den 27.02.2017, 16:20 +0100 schrieb Magnus Hagander:
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>         Is there an argument for back-patching this?
>
>
> Seems you were typing that at the same time as we did.
>
>
> I'm considering it, but not swayed in either direction. Should I take
> your comment as a vote that we should back-patch it?

I've checked back into this thread, and there seems to be a +1 from Tom
and a +(0.5-1) from Simon for backpatching, and no obvious -1s. Did you
decide against it in the end, or is this still an open item?

No, I plan to work on it, so it's still an open item. I've been backlogged with other things, but I will try to get too it soon.

(This also includes considering Jeff's note) 

--

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Partitioned tables and relfilenode
Следующее
От: Magnus Hagander
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Typo in libpq