On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 6:20 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> > David Steele voted for back-patching this on the grounds that it would
> > make future back-patching easier, which is an argument that seems to
> > me to have some merit, although on the other hand, we are already into
> > August so it's quite late in the day. Anyone else want to vote?
>
> Seems like low-risk refactoring, so +1 for keeping v15 close to HEAD.
+1, but I suggest also getting a hat-tip from the RMT on it.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/