Re: Apt & Downloads page

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Magnus Hagander
Тема Re: Apt & Downloads page
Дата
Msg-id CABUevEyNcBDke9=zDS4mecsTUsz6GMc9Tug-jbgRYWU+qbAT3Q@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Apt & Downloads page  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Ответы Re: Apt & Downloads page
Список pgsql-www
<p dir="ltr"><br /> On Jun 11, 2015 6:10 PM, "Joshua D. Drake" <<a
href="mailto:jd@commandprompt.com">jd@commandprompt.com</a>>wrote:<br /> ><br /> ><br /> > On 06/11/2015
02:52AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:<br /> >><br /> >> those commands into a script and execute a script.<br />
>><br/> >> So what would actually be required to use apt-add-repository? Does it<br /> >> require
someextra metadata to be published, or is it just about the<br /> >> instructions themselves? If so,what should
theybe for Ubuntu?<br /> ><br /> ><br /> > Here is the verbiage on it:<br /> ><br /> > <a
href="http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/trusty/man1/add-apt-repository.1.html">http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/trusty/man1/add-apt-repository.1.html</a><br
/>><br /> > Looks like we could have a ppa, that ppa I assume would just have all the information point to the
communityservers (versus landscape) or we can also use the command line options to add the repo directly or both.<br
/><pdir="ltr">Pretty sure ppa requires it to be on launchpad, no? <p dir="ltr">And afaict it doesn't handle the signing
keysfor other repos? If so, I don't really see the gain with having it, since we'd still need multiple steps? <p
dir="ltr">/Magnus 

В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Joshua D. Drake"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Apt & Downloads page
Следующее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Apt & Downloads page