Re: New CF app deployment

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Magnus Hagander
Тема Re: New CF app deployment
Дата
Msg-id CABUevEz5U=5eLG66Scd3wkXrbsEN5OOYNN7n6JU8e3-mrY6H5A@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: New CF app deployment  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Ответы Re: New CF app deployment  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Re: New CF app deployment  (Marco Nenciarini <marco.nenciarini@2ndquadrant.it>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 1:02 AM, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote:


One thing that would probably *help* is if the list of attachments
mentioned the names of the files that were attached to each message
rather than just noting that they have some kind of attachment.  If
people name their attachments sensibly, then you'll be able to
distinguish parallel-seqscan-v23.patch from
test-case-that-breaks-parallel-seqscan.sql, and that would be nice.

Yes, I was going to request that as well. 


Ok, this is easy enough. There's a field missing in an API call but it shouldn't be that hard - I'll add this to the short term todo. 


Filenames are now shown for attachments, including a direct link to the attachment itself.  I've also run a job to populate all old threads.

--

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Marko Tiikkaja
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Fetch zero result rows when executing a query?
Следующее
От: Michael Meskes
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: ecpg array support, or lack thereof