Re: CREATEROLE users vs. role properties

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От tushar
Тема Re: CREATEROLE users vs. role properties
Дата
Msg-id CAC6VRoaZ3K4yVCx5eSbz3KYzxkEo=x7sFeoovm93+YXAJDRv4g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: CREATEROLE users vs. role properties  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: CREATEROLE users vs. role properties  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers


On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 10:28 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:

In previous releases, you needed to have CREATEROLE in order to be
able to perform user management functions. In master, you still need
CREATEROLE, and you also need ADMIN OPTION on the role. In this
scenario, only t1 meets those requirements with respect to t3, so only
t1 can manage t3. t2 can SET ROLE to t3 and grant membership in t3,
but it can't set role properties on t3 or change t3's password or
things like that, because the ability to make user management changes
is controlled by CREATEROLE.
ok. 

The patch is only intended to change behavior in the case where you
possess both CREATEROLE and also ADMIN OPTION on the target role (but
not SUPERUSER). In that scenario, it intends to change whether you can
give or remove the CREATEDB, REPLICATION, and BYPASSRLS properties
from a user.

right, Neha/I have tested with different scenarios using createdb/replication/bypassrls and other
privileges properties on the role. also checked pg_dumpall/pg_basebackup and everything looks fine.

regards,
  

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Takamichi Osumi (Fujitsu)"
Дата:
Сообщение: RE: Time delayed LR (WAS Re: logical replication restrictions)
Следующее
От: "Takamichi Osumi (Fujitsu)"
Дата:
Сообщение: RE: Time delayed LR (WAS Re: logical replication restrictions)