On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 2:25 PM jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> hi.
> I found an interesting case.
>
> CREATE TABLE t1 AS
> SELECT (i % 10)::numeric AS x,(i % 10)::int8 AS y,'abc' || i % 10 AS
> z, i::int4 AS w
> FROM generate_series(1, 100) AS i;
> CREATE INDEX t1_x_y_idx ON t1 (x, y);
> ANALYZE t1;
> SET enable_hashagg = off;
> SET enable_seqscan = off;
>
> EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT count(*) FROM t1 GROUP BY x,z,y,w;
> EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT count(*) FROM t1 GROUP BY x,w,y,z;
> EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT count(*) FROM t1 GROUP BY x,z,w,y;
> EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT count(*) FROM t1 GROUP BY x,w,z,y;
> the above part will use:
> -> Incremental Sort
> Sort Key: x, $, $, $
> Presorted Key: x
> -> Index Scan using t1_x_y_idx on t1
We can make these cases also `Presorted Key: x, y`.
in
`if (path->pathkeys && !pathkeys_contained_in(path->pathkeys,
root->group_pathkeys))` branch
we can simple do
- infos = lappend(infos, info);
+ infos = lcons(info, infos);
similar to what we did at plancat.c (search lcons).
get_useful_group_keys_orderings returns a list of PathKeyInfo,
then the caller function just iterates each element.
so for the caller, order of the returned list element from
get_useful_group_keys_orderings
does not matter.
for path Incremental Sort:
function make_ordered_path will return the same cost for different
numbers of presorted keys.
for example:
EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT count(*) FROM t1 GROUP BY x,z,y,w;
make_ordered_path cost is same for:
`info->pathkeys: x,y,z,w`
`info->pathkeys:x,z,y,w`
if we arrange `info->pathkeys: x,y,z,w` before `info->pathkeys:x,z,y,w`
in get_useful_group_keys_orderings.
then with the same cost, we will choose the first one
(`info->pathkeys: x,y,z,w`),
if we use IncrementalSort, then we use `Presorted Key: x, y`.