On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Agreed. Attached the updated patch, please review it.
Thank you for the comment.
> + /*
> + * Quick exit if session is not keeping around a non-exclusive backup
> + * already started.
> + */
> + if (sessionBackupState != SESSION_BACKUP_NON_EXCLUSIVE)
> + return;
> I think that it would be more solid to use SESSION_BACKUP_NONE for the
> comparison, and complete the assertion after the quick exit as follows
> as this code path should never be taken for an exclusive backup:
Agreed.
> + Assert(XLogCtl->Insert.nonExclusiveBackups > 0 &&
> + sessionBackupState == SESSION_BACKUP_NON_EXCLUSIVE);
>
> And your patch would discard both SESSION_BACKUP_EXCLUSIVE and
> SESSION_BACKUP_NONE.
Attached the latest patch. Please review it.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center