On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 2:31 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 2:40 PM wangw.fnst@fujitsu.com
> <wangw.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 2, 2023 at 18:54 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 3:55 PM wangw.fnst@fujitsu.com
> > > <wangw.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I've checked it and it looks good to me.
> > > > Rebased the other patches and ran the pgident for the patch set.
> > > >
> > > > Attach the new patch set.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I have added a few DEBUG messages and changed a few comments in the
> > > 0001 patch. With that v71-0001* looks good to me and I'll commit it
> > > later this week (by Thursday or Friday) unless there are any major
> > > comments or objections.
> >
> > Thanks for your improvement.
> >
> > Rebased the patch set because the new change in HEAD (c8e1ba7).
> > Attach the new patch set.
>
> There are some unused parameters in v72 patches:
>
> ---
> +/*
> + * Make sure the leader apply worker tries to read from our error
> queue one more
> + * time. This guards against the case where we exit uncleanly without sending
> + * an ErrorResponse, for example because some code calls proc_exit directly.
> + */
> +static void
> +pa_shutdown(int code, Datum arg)
>
> Similarly, we don't use 'code' here.
This is necessary. Sorry for the noise.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com