On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 11/14/2013 07:02 AM, Sawada Masahiko wrote:
>
>> I attached patch adds new wal_level 'all'.
>
>
> Shouldn't this be a separate setting? It's useful for storage which
> requires rewriting a partially written sector before it can be read again.
>
Thank you for comment.
Actually, I had thought to add separate parameter.
If so, this feature logs enough information with all of the wal_level
(e.g., minimal) ?
And I thought that relation between wal_lvel and new feature would be
confuse user.
Regards,
-------
Sawada Masahiko