Re: {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Masahiko Sawada
Тема Re: {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
Дата
Msg-id CAD21AoDcUZfh=D05gwmG9_=uqAjH7AiVwqP8geMn=nZ=DpVupA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements  (Hamid Akhtar <hamid.akhtar@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements  (Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 5:18 PM Hamid Akhtar <hamid.akhtar@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
> make installcheck-world:  tested, passed
> Implements feature:       not tested
> Spec compliant:           not tested
> Documentation:            not tested
>
> The patch looks good to me. With regards to the code comments, I had pretty similar concerns as already raised by
Dmitry;and those have already been answered by you. So this patch is good to go from my side once you have updated the
commentsper your last email. 

For the 0001 patch, since ReindexIndexInfo is used only within
ReindexRelationConcurrently() I think it’s a function-local structure
type. So we can declare it within the function. What do you think?

Regards,


--
Masahiko Sawada
EnterpriseDB:  https://www.enterprisedb.com/



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Luc Vlaming
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Parallel Inserts in CREATE TABLE AS
Следующее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: poc - possibility to write window function in PL languages