Re: Immutable function WAY slower than Stable function?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Ken Tanzer
Тема Re: Immutable function WAY slower than Stable function?
Дата
Msg-id CAD3a31Xu+XHf70HnWeS+rXEvBypOBihDNU1N8DOEaXB36HSi6Q@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Immutable function WAY slower than Stable function?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Immutable function WAY slower than Stable function?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-general
On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 7:42 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Ken Tanzer <ken.tanzer@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi Adrian.  Happy to provide this info.  Though on a side note, I don't
> understand why it should matter, if functions are black box optimization
> fences.

They aren't, at least not when they are SQL-language functions that
meet the conditions for inlining. 

Yeah, I kinda realized after I sent this that I wasn't really making much sense.  :)  I appreciate your explanation though.

The reason that EXPLAIN VERBOSE
is helpful here is that you can see whether the function got inlined
or not: do you see a call to the function, or a representation of
its body?

I wasn't able to get anything more VERBOSE than what I sent before.  I re-copied it below.  (If there's another command or option I should be using, please advise.)

There is the difference in the two output lines, which I guess suggests that the stable one got inlined and the immutable one didn't?

   Output: client_id, si_imm(client_id)
   Output: client_id, staff_inspector_stable(client_id, target_date())

spc=> EXPLAIN (ANALYZE,BUFFERS,VERBOSE) SELECT client_id,si_imm(client_id) FROM tbl_residence_own;
                                                          QUERY PLAN                                                           
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Seq Scan on public.tbl_residence_own  (cost=0.00..1990.02 rows=6977 width=8) (actual time=3.771..22665.604 rows=6983 loops=1)
   Output: client_id, si_imm(client_id)
   Buffers: shared hit=199814Planning time: 0.156 msExecution time: 22677.333 ms
(5 rows)

spc=> EXPLAIN (ANALYZE,BUFFERS,VERBOSE) SELECT client_id,si_stable(client_id) FROM tbl_residence_own;                                                         QUERY PLAN                                                          
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Seq Scan on public.tbl_residence_own  (cost=0.00..3734.27 rows=6977 width=8) (actual time=3.100..1302.888 rows=6983 loops=1)
   Output: client_id, staff_inspector_stable(client_id, target_date())
   Buffers: shared hit=60174Planning time: 0.354 msExecution time: 1315.746 ms
(5 rows)
Cheers,
Ken




--
AGENCY Software  
A Free Software data system
By and for non-profits
(253) 245-3801

learn more about AGENCY or
follow the discussion.

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Immutable function WAY slower than Stable function?
Следующее
От: Laurenz Albe
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Immutable function WAY slower than Stable function?