Re: group by can use alias from select list but not the having clause

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Pantelis Theodosiou
Тема Re: group by can use alias from select list but not the having clause
Дата
Msg-id CAE3TBxyWiQ6RnBJT0=gP5RRGANQ3d_MkR38b_8NGYLDAsGr1zw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: group by can use alias from select list but not the having clause  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-bugs


On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 3:12 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
hape Hape <postgres-hape@gmx.de> writes:
> works (how does the group by know about otto if the sequence is done as
> described above?)

This is intentional and documented, eg
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-select.html#SQL-GROUPBY
says

    An expression used inside a grouping_element can be an input column
    name, or the name or ordinal number of an output column (SELECT list
    item), or an arbitrary expression formed from input-column values.

whereas the discussion of HAVING does not mention allowing output
columns.  The reason for this is mainly that it'd seldom be useful
for a HAVING expression to be just a bare column reference, but
as soon as you write something that's not a bare column reference,
the output-column special case is disallowed anyway.

Tom, the HAVING clause section has: 

> ... Each column referenced in condition must unambiguously reference a grouping column, ...

I suppose "grouping column" can be read to mean what is called "grouping element" in GROUP BY section and that it may be either input or output column, leading to the confusion.
Perhaps this phrase can be improved to make this clearer.

Best regards
Pantelis Theodosiou

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: group by can use alias from select list but not the having clause
Следующее
От: Thomas Munro
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #17949: Adding an index introduces serialisation anomalies.