Re: walprotocol.h vs frontends

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: walprotocol.h vs frontends
Дата
Msg-id CAEYLb_Un7naQUe3urCGjshTZBXRVdFBRiNOiB+5bsruy1FYL6Q@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: walprotocol.h vs frontends  (Steve Singer <ssinger@ca.afilias.info>)
Ответы Re: walprotocol.h vs frontends  (Steve Singer <ssinger@ca.afilias.info>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 15 August 2011 16:56, Steve Singer <ssinger@ca.afilias.info> wrote:
> This would mean that anyone using the floating point timestamps today won't
> be able to use pg_upgrade to upgrade to whichever version we remove them
> from.  8.3 had float based timestamps as the default and I suspect many
> installations with the default 8.3 settings have been upgraded via
> pg_upgrade to 9.0 built the old timestamps representation.

Really? I find that slightly surprising, considering that a quick look
at master's timestamp.c suggests that the choice to use the in64
representation over the double representation is entirely a case of
compile time either/or. There is no apparent fall-back to the double
representation available to binaries built without
--disable-integer-datetimes.

--
Peter Geoghegan       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Magnus Hagander
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: walprotocol.h vs frontends
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: walprotocol.h vs frontends